Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement

A declaration form is supposed to be submitted by the corresponding author

I/We hereby declare that the above mentioned research paper has not been submitted to any other journal for publication nor will it be submitted to any other journal until The Journal of the Indian Botanical Society declines to publish it. I/We also declare that the work contained in the said research paper is my/our original contribution, and has not been published anywhere. I/We have mentioned the relevant references within my/our knowledge.

We further declare that the authors have no competing interests and all the authors listed have read and approved the manuscript. The sole responsibility in this respect lies with the corresponding author.

Duties / Responsibilities of Editors

The Editorial Team of the JIBS, comprising the Editorial Board and the Committee for Publications is responsible for taking a decision regarding the articles submitted to the journal and to be published. The Editors have complete discretion to reject/accept an article. The Editorial Team may confer/deliberate with other reviewers/editors in arriving at its decisions. The evaluation of manuscripts is made on the basis of their scholarly and intellectual content without having regard to the nature of the authors or the institution including gender, race, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. The journal follows a policy of fair play in its editorial evaluation. The editors are expected to exercise caution and ensure whether they have conflict of interest or not with respect to the articles they accept/reject. The editors and the editorial staff follow strict confidentiality and are required not to disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers and the publisher. Authors are encouraged to correct the errors which are found during the process of review while preserving the anonymity of the reviewers.

Duties / Responsibilities of Reviewers

Editorial decisions are based on peer review. The reviewers are expected to maintain absolute confidentiality with regard to the contents of manuscripts. The reviews are to be conducted objectively and the referees are expected to express their views clearly with supporting reasons. The reviewers should have no conflict of interest with the authors and the subject matter of the research. The reviewers are required to identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any observation or argument which has been previously reported should also be accompanied along with the relevant citation. Similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under review and any other published paper of which the reviewer may have personal knowledge, may also be brought to be attention of the editors. The information or ideas obtained through peer review are of a privileged nature and must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative or other relationship with any of authors or institutions connected to the papers.